Studying for the A+, Network+ or Security+ exams? Get over 2,600 pages of FREE study guides at CertiGuide.com!|
Join the PC homebuilding revolution! Read the all-new, FREE 200-page online guide: How to Build Your Own PC!
NOTE: Using robot software to mass-download the site degrades the server and is prohibited. See here for more.
Find The PC Guide helpful? Please consider a donation to The PC Guide Tip Jar. Visa/MC/Paypal accepted.
|View over 750 of my fine art photos any time for free at DesktopScenes.com!|
[ The PC Guide | Systems and Components Reference Guide | Hard Disk Drives | Hard Disk Performance, Quality and Reliability | Hard Disk Performance | Hard Disk External Performance Factors | File System Factors ]
File System Type
The file system refers to the structures that are used to organize data at a high level on the disk; the file system is used by the operating system to store files, directories and other relevant information on the disk for later retrieval. As such, the file system is highly operating-system-dependent. In most cases you don't generally have a "choice" between different file system types. However, in some operating systems you do, and there can be a performance impact from the choice.
Some file systems store files in packages as small as 512 bytes, while others store files in larger chunks called allocation units or clusters. Some are very simple file systems with few features and little overhead (such as the FAT file system used in DOS and Windows 9x), and others have many features but comparatively higher overhead (NTFS used in NT). Windows NT and 2000 typically give you your choice of file system; Windows 2000 supports FAT16, FAT32 and NTFS. See here for more on the different file systems used in the PC.
Which file system you use can have an effect on overall performance, but it is relatively small: typically a few percentage points. It's also difficult to predict exactly what the effect will be for a given system when selecting from one file system to another. Since the file system affects so many other usability factors of the PC, performance is usually not one of the primary factors for deciding between them. As an example, consider the "FAT vs. NTFS" decision, which is probably the most common "file system decision" in the PC world today. These two file systems are so different in so many ways that most people choose one or the other for reasons particular to their use, not performance. If you need the high security and advanced management features of NTFS, you are probably going to use NTFS even if FAT is a few percentage points "faster". Similarly, if you need the compatibility and simplicity of FAT, changing to NTFS for a few ticks on a benchmark is probably unwise.
One file system choice that is commonly made in part for performance reasons is "FAT16 vs. FAT32"; this is really a "sub-file-system" choice, since FAT16 and FAT32 are really two flavors of the same file system. The primary performance impact of changing between these has nothing to do with anything inherently different between FAT16 or FAT32, but rather the difference in cluster size that results from the choice. See here for more details on this.